Indian Government giving tax benefits to few chosen big corporate
Indian Government giving tax benefits to few chosen big corporate. Elaborate and quote the instants.
The Indian government has, at various times, introduced tax benefits and incentives for corporations, often with the aim of promoting economic growth, attracting foreign investment, and encouraging specific sectors. However, critics have argued that some of these benefits disproportionately favor large corporations, potentially leading to concerns about equity and fairness in the tax system. Below are some instances and explanations of such tax benefits:
1. Corporate Tax Rate Reduction (2019)
What Happened? In September 2019, the Indian government reduced the corporate tax rate for domestic companies from 30% to 22% (effective tax rate reduced to 25.17% including surcharges). For new manufacturing companies, the rate was slashed to 15% (effective tax rate of 17.01%).
Rationale: The move was aimed at boosting investment, reviving economic growth, and making India more competitive globally.
Criticism: While the reduction was available to all domestic companies, critics argued that it primarily benefited large corporations with higher profits, as smaller businesses often struggle to even make profits and pay taxes. The revenue loss from this tax cut was estimated at ₹1.45 lakh crore annually, raising concerns about fiscal prudence.
2. Tax Concessions for Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
What Happened? Companies operating in SEZs enjoy tax holidays, exemptions, and reduced tariffs. For example, under Section 10AA of the Income Tax Act, SEZ units were granted 100% tax exemption on profits for the first five years, 50% for the next five years, and 50% of the ploughed-back export profit for another five years.
Rationale: SEZs were designed to attract foreign investment, boost exports, and create jobs.
Criticism: Many SEZs have been accused of being real estate ventures rather than hubs for genuine economic activity. Large corporations have benefited significantly from these tax breaks, while smaller businesses often lack the resources to set up operations in SEZs.
3. Retrospective Tax Abolition (2021)
What Happened? In August 2021, the government repealed the controversial retrospective tax law, which had been used to levy taxes on companies like Vodafone and Cairn Energy for deals involving Indian assets. The government also agreed to refund taxes collected under this law.
Rationale: The move was aimed at improving India's image as an investment-friendly destination and resolving long-standing disputes with multinational corporations.
Criticism: Critics argued that the decision to refund taxes (amounting to thousands of crores) favored large corporations at the expense of public funds, especially when the government was facing fiscal constraints.
4. Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Schemes
What Happened? The government introduced PLI schemes for various sectors, including electronics, pharmaceuticals, automobiles, and textiles. These schemes offer financial incentives (4-6% of incremental sales) to companies that meet specific production and investment targets.
Rationale: The PLI schemes aim to boost domestic manufacturing, reduce imports, and create jobs.
Criticism: While the schemes are open to all eligible companies, larger corporations with greater resources are better positioned to meet the stringent investment and production targets. Smaller firms often struggle to qualify, leading to concerns about unequal benefits.
5. Tax Exemptions for Startups
What Happened? The government introduced tax exemptions for eligible startups under Section 80-IAC of the Income Tax Act, allowing them to claim a 100% tax holiday on profits for three consecutive years out of their first ten years of operation.
Rationale: The policy was designed to encourage entrepreneurship and innovation.
Criticism: While the policy benefits startups, critics argue that the eligibility criteria (such as turnover limits and certification by an inter-ministerial board) are complex and favor well-connected or larger startups over smaller ones.
6. Customs Duty Exemptions for Specific Industries
What Happened? The government has occasionally provided customs duty exemptions or reductions for specific industries, such as electronics, solar panels, and electric vehicles, to promote domestic manufacturing and reduce costs.
Rationale: These exemptions are intended to make Indian industries more competitive and reduce reliance on imports.
Criticism: Critics argue that such exemptions often benefit large corporations with significant lobbying power, while smaller businesses may not have the same access to these benefits.
7. Bankruptcy Code and Write-offs for Large Corporations
What Happened? The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been used to resolve cases of corporate insolvency. In some instances, large corporations have been able to settle their debts at significant discounts, effectively writing off large portions of their liabilities.
Rationale: The IBC aims to resolve insolvency cases efficiently and revive distressed businesses.
Criticism: Critics argue that the system often favors large corporations and promoters, allowing them to escape significant financial obligations while smaller businesses and individual borrowers face stricter enforcement.
Conclusion:
While the Indian government's tax policies and incentives are often designed to stimulate economic growth and attract investment, they have sometimes been criticized for disproportionately benefiting large corporations. Critics argue that such policies can exacerbate inequality, reduce tax revenues, and create an uneven playing field for smaller businesses. To address these concerns, there have been calls for more equitable tax policies, better targeting of incentives, and greater transparency in how benefits are allocated.
The term "chosen big corporates" often refers to large corporations that are perceived to benefit disproportionately from government policies, tax breaks, or incentives. While the Indian government typically designs policies to benefit entire sectors or industries, certain companies—due to their size, influence, or strategic importance—tend to gain more from these measures. Below are some examples of corporations and sectors that have been highlighted in discussions about preferential treatment:
1. Reliance Industries Limited (RIL)
Why Mentioned? Reliance, led by Mukesh Ambani, has been a major beneficiary of government policies, particularly in sectors like telecom, retail, and energy. For instance:
The government's Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for telecom and electronics has benefited Reliance Jio, which is a major player in the telecom sector.
Reliance has also benefited from favorable policies in the oil and gas sector, including pricing and export incentives.
Criticism: Critics argue that Reliance's close ties with the government and its ability to influence policy have given it an edge over competitors.
2. Adani Group
Why Mentioned? The Adani Group, led by Gautam Adani, has seen rapid growth in sectors like infrastructure, energy, and ports, often attributed to favorable government policies:
The group has secured large contracts in infrastructure projects, including airports, ports, and renewable energy, often through direct negotiations or favorable bidding conditions.
Adani has also benefited from policies promoting renewable energy and coal mining.
Criticism: Critics allege that the Adani Group's close alignment with government priorities has helped it secure lucrative deals and regulatory approvals.
3. Tata Group
Why Mentioned? The Tata Group, one of India's oldest and largest conglomerates, has benefited from government policies in sectors like automotive, steel, and IT:
Tata Motors has benefited from incentives for electric vehicles (EVs) under the FAME-II scheme.
Tata Steel has gained from policies supporting domestic manufacturing and infrastructure development.
Criticism: While the Tata Group is widely respected, critics argue that its scale and influence give it an advantage in accessing government incentives.
4. Bharti Airtel
Why Mentioned? Bharti Airtel, led by Sunil Mittal, is a major player in the telecom sector and has benefited from government policies:
The telecom sector has seen relief measures like deferred spectrum payments and adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues, which have helped companies like Airtel.
Airtel has also benefited from the PLI scheme for telecom equipment manufacturing.
Criticism: Critics argue that relief measures for the telecom sector have disproportionately helped larger players like Airtel and Reliance Jio, while smaller operators have struggled.
5. Vedanta Resources
Why Mentioned? Vedanta, led by Anil Agarwal, has benefited from policies in the mining and natural resources sector:
The company has secured mining rights and approvals for projects in states like Odisha and Rajasthan.
Vedanta has also benefited from policies promoting domestic production of metals and minerals.
Criticism: Critics allege that Vedanta's influence has helped it secure favorable terms and bypass regulatory hurdles.
6. Infosys, TCS, and Wipro
Why Mentioned? These IT giants have benefited from policies promoting the technology sector, including tax incentives for software exports and special economic zones (SEZs):
The IT sector enjoys tax holidays and reduced tariffs under SEZ policies.
These companies have also benefited from government contracts and digital transformation initiatives.
Criticism: While the IT sector is a major contributor to India's economy, critics argue that smaller IT firms struggle to compete with the dominance of these giants.
7. Automobile Manufacturers (Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra & Mahindra)
Why Mentioned? Automobile companies have benefited from policies promoting manufacturing and electric vehicles:
The FAME-II scheme provides subsidies for EVs, benefiting companies like Mahindra & Mahindra and Tata Motors.
Maruti Suzuki has benefited from policies supporting the automotive sector and infrastructure development.
Criticism: Critics argue that smaller players in the EV and automotive sectors find it difficult to compete with established giants.
8. Pharmaceutical Companies (Sun Pharma, Dr. Reddy's)
Why Mentioned? Pharma companies have benefited from policies promoting drug manufacturing and exports:
The PLI scheme for pharmaceuticals has provided incentives for domestic production of bulk drugs and medical devices.
Companies like Sun Pharma and Dr. Reddy's have also benefited from government contracts and export incentives.
Criticism: Critics argue that smaller pharma companies struggle to meet the stringent criteria for PLI schemes, giving larger players an advantage.
9. Renewable Energy Companies (ReNew Power, Adani Green)
Why Mentioned? Companies in the renewable energy sector have benefited from policies promoting clean energy:
Adani Green and ReNew Power have secured large contracts for solar and wind energy projects.
The government's focus on renewable energy has provided these companies with significant growth opportunities.
Criticism: Critics argue that the allocation of projects and incentives often favors large corporations with political connections.
10. Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) like ONGC, IOCL, and NTPC
Why Mentioned? While PSUs are government-owned, they often benefit from favorable policies and subsidies:
ONGC and IOCL have benefited from policies in the oil and gas sector, including pricing mechanisms and exploration rights.
NTPC has gained from policies promoting power generation and infrastructure development.
Criticism: Critics argue that PSUs often enjoy monopolistic advantages, limiting competition from private players.
Conclusion:
The "chosen big corporates" are typically large, influential companies that benefit from their scale, resources, and alignment with government priorities. While these companies contribute significantly to India's economy, critics argue that the concentration of benefits among a few players can stifle competition and disadvantage smaller businesses. Addressing these concerns requires greater transparency, equitable policy design, and a focus on fostering a level playing field for all businesses.
Comments
Post a Comment